Oldbloke wrote:"US Defence analysts talking about the fact that they will never get resources to make subs for us, as they are strapped trying to meet a quota for themselves"
I've heard similar from elsewhere. I think its US congress that has issues.
We just have to wait and see I guess.
alexjones wrote:Oldbloke wrote:"US Defence analysts talking about the fact that they will never get resources to make subs for us, as they are strapped trying to meet a quota for themselves"
I've heard similar from elsewhere. I think its US congress that has issues.
We just have to wait and see I guess.
I think you and me will be dead before the subs come mate. We will be waiting a longtime.
Oldbloke wrote:Someone else here who is in the ADF may be able to confirm.
But I was told by someone who works in the industry that Marles is starving the ADF of funds.
No money for pens and paper, let alone a few rounds of 7.62 nato for practice.
alexjones wrote:A few years ago it was posted that the Army only has around 18 hours worth of small arms ammunition for heavy combat conditions. Basically one land invasion and one major battle and we are out of ammo.
I doubt the “stockpile” has increased.
I am all for government accountability but surely somethings should be kept secret for national security. Why tell the world we have no ammo to fight an invasion.
This is why we have America as our so called ally. Nobody is yet brazen enough to attack us with American troops in Darwin.
Say what you will about America as they have their problems but they don't F around.
bladeracer wrote:I doubt we need to tell anybody, it doesn't take much deduction to work out that we have zero military capability, so why would we have stockpiles of ammo for troops and weapons we don't have, and without people or weapons to use it why would it matter if we did have stockpiles? Do we even have stockpiles of fuel to run vehicles and aircraft for any length of time?alexjones wrote:A few years ago it was posted that the Army only has around 18 hours worth of small arms ammunition for heavy combat conditions. Basically one land invasion and one major battle and we are out of ammo.
I doubt the “stockpile” has increased.
I am all for government accountability but surely somethings should be kept secret for national security. Why tell the world we have no ammo to fight an invasion.
This is why we have America as our so called ally. Nobody is yet brazen enough to attack us with American troops in Darwin.
Say what you will about America as they have their problems but they don't F around.
alexjones wrote:Oldbloke wrote:Someone else here who is in the ADF may be able to confirm.
But I was told by someone who works in the industry that Marles is starving the ADF of funds.
No money for pens and paper, let alone a few rounds of 7.62 nato for practice.
A few years ago it was posted that the Army only has around 18 hours worth of small arms ammunition for heavy combat conditions. Basically one land invasion and one major battle and we are out of ammo.
I doubt the “stockpile” has increased.
I am all for government accountability but surely somethings should be kept secret for national security. Why tell the world we have no ammo to fight an invasion.
This is why we have America as our so called ally. Nobody is yet brazen enough to attack us with American troops in Darwin.
Say what you will about America as they have their problems but they don't F around.
bigrich wrote:Just saw on my news feed this morning, one fully operational Collin’s sub. All the rest are in for major maintenance and repairs. Apparently corrosion is one of the main issues. By the sounds of that if you try to take a Collin’s deep they’ll implode.
The way the adf has been financed we’ll be lucky if new patrol boats aren’t recycled fishing boats with a oversized outboard and a ex Indian army Bren gun mounted on it
Billo wrote:Making Himar shells locally should be a good thing and for Ukraine
https://mil.in.ua/en/news/australia-to- ... -per-year/
Oldbloke wrote:Billo wrote:Making Himar shells locally should be a good thing and for Ukraine
https://mil.in.ua/en/news/australia-to- ... -per-year/
There are a few things happening ATM.
NIOA is making 155mm ammo, but not filling them.
Drones are happening too I think.
bigrich wrote:Oldbloke wrote:Billo wrote:Making Himar shells locally should be a good thing and for Ukraine
https://mil.in.ua/en/news/australia-to- ... -per-year/
There are a few things happening ATM.
NIOA is making 155mm ammo, but not filling them.
Drones are happening too I think.
Underwater naval drones are a big thing now. Lots of developments in this field. But Australia has a massive coastline. The amount of foreign fishing boats raiding our waters is rediculous . We don’t have the resources to maintain our borders from Indonesian villager’s in half assed fishing boats. How easy is it to get contraband into our country let alone foreign agents.
mickb wrote:bigrich wrote:Oldbloke wrote:Billo wrote:Making Himar shells locally should be a good thing and for Ukraine
https://mil.in.ua/en/news/australia-to- ... -per-year/
There are a few things happening ATM.
NIOA is making 155mm ammo, but not filling them.
Drones are happening too I think.
Underwater naval drones are a big thing now. Lots of developments in this field. But Australia has a massive coastline. The amount of foreign fishing boats raiding our waters is rediculous . We don’t have the resources to maintain our borders from Indonesian villager’s in half assed fishing boats. How easy is it to get contraband into our country let alone foreign agents.
yeah defence of Australia is never a thing. We are the completely wrong concept to defend. Limited assets, massive coastline, our few major assets(cities) neatly lined up on the exterior(coast).
I remember in the army it was sort of funny everyone would picture the chinks/commies landing in the north and struggling through the outback to get to the cities, blokes would even rate our poisonous snakes as a deterrant.
With Australia you dont need to walk anywhere. We have a tiny navy, all our assets are on the outside edge of the country, you just sail up to the easy targets, a single medium missile ship takes out our defence force before it even reaches our waters, they blockade our ports and as we dont make anything they control our resources.
We lose quickly militarily, the real fight is how much the (disarmed) population themselves resists a takeover, or which major power wants to save us.