Wapiti wrote:I've been following the progress of ASA and their work on bringing new firearms to the Aus market, specifically ones built here. I think, especially in today's fickle consumer market, it's extremely brave of these guys to be pulling this off.
I'm referring to the Eurekas in 223 (Aus made) and Chimeras (Turkish made) in both 223, 308, 9mm and 12ga.
The honesty of them in explaining the issues they've had, including some design faults (which to be fair, are part and parcel of doing this sort of stuff) is unreal and unheard of today. This includes the inevitable bullsh*t that they are copping from individual states licensing officials.
Manufacturers do not ever have to be so open and honest with all this, including their failures, but the result inevitably is that these products are going to be pretty damn good.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JluyYzLhtxg
There's many updates in the past too, for those interested in what's being done here.
Not trying to be a smart-arse, but as a dual metal tradesperson and Mech Engineer, I am sympathetic with their attempts especially their explanations of problems they've overcome show some mistakes, but they have been quick to realise this and make changes. Things like gas blocks made from aluminum to save on cost and machine time ending up being unacceptable.
They've also been incredibly receptive to taking on suggestions to make their products more foolproof and reliable, even one which I proposed such as redesigning the 308 to take Pmags instead of another unique proprietary design of Turkish home-grown steel mags, for example. Which they are actually doing.
I think there are firearms here about to be released which will be accepted enthusiastically by those who see the usefulness of these firearms. Primary Producers and pest controllers who can't access Cat D gear, or paper shooters in IPSC for example, or just general urban shooters and hunters looking for something different to have some pleasure with. They won't suit everyone's needs or biases, but I think they are going to kick all the others for six pretty soon. If this really does come to fruition.
Blr243 wrote:Blade , during your chat with bastion , did u get any idea of when those eureka rifles will hit the shelves ? I’m wondering if my pta will expire
Wapiti wrote:I've been following the progress of ASA and their work on bringing new firearms to the Aus market, specifically ones built here. I think, especially in today's fickle consumer market, it's extremely brave of these guys to be pulling this off.
I'm referring to the Eurekas in 223 (Aus made) and Chimeras (Turkish made) in both 223, 308, 9mm and 12ga.
The honesty of them in explaining the issues they've had, including some design faults (which to be fair, are part and parcel of doing this sort of stuff) is unreal and unheard of today. This includes the inevitable bullsh*t that they are copping from individual states licensing officials.
Manufacturers do not ever have to be so open and honest with all this, including their failures, but the result inevitably is that these products are going to be pretty damn good.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JluyYzLhtxg
There's many updates in the past too, for those interested in what's being done here.
Not trying to be a smart-arse, but as a dual metal tradesperson and Mech Engineer, I am sympathetic with their attempts especially their explanations of problems they've overcome show some mistakes, but they have been quick to realise this and make changes. Things like gas blocks made from aluminum to save on cost and machine time ending up being unacceptable.
They've also been incredibly receptive to taking on suggestions to make their products more foolproof and reliable, even one which I proposed such as redesigning the 308 to take Pmags instead of another unique proprietary design of Turkish home-grown steel mags, for example. Which they are actually doing.
I think there are firearms here about to be released which will be accepted enthusiastically by those who see the usefulness of these firearms. Primary Producers and pest controllers who can't access Cat D gear, or paper shooters in IPSC for example, or just general urban shooters and hunters looking for something different to have some pleasure with. They won't suit everyone's needs or biases, but I think they are going to kick all the others for six pretty soon. If this really does come to fruition.
Wapiti wrote:Well I've made a huge mistake in hoping this firearm would be a "game changer".
Any of you with engineering design interests who check out the videos, especially part 2, will be disappointed. I had high hopes, especially with a supposed "clean sheet" design, but I was wrong.
The awful flimsy scope rail clamped to the barrel on the very end with two screws (imagine this with the huge scopes people need nowadays stressing the mount end, flapping about), the use of set screws holding everything together instead of the parts themselves being threaded together to secure them (example, the gas piston), springs compressing to past their design lengths and weights instead of "settling" to their design weights, the barrel pinch bolt being a huge wear issue needing to be taken in/out to clean and coming loose due to forces. They think changing it to an LH thread will solve it and tightening it to almost yield points.
Yes, being a Monday's expert is not an endearing trait but, bloody hell. Imagine the 308 version tearing itself to bits with this same design and all the extra forces, gas and stresses.
This is why the AR design, modified to a gas piston design over the DI system has been so successful, despite some people's dislike of it. It is immune to all these issues. Bugger.
stihl88 wrote:Anyone who doesn't like the AR has never touched or owned one.
bladeracer wrote:stihl88 wrote:Anyone who doesn't like the AR has never touched or owned one.
I LOVE the AR, but I don't need a crippled aesthetic replica of one
Wapiti wrote:Well I've made a huge mistake in hoping this firearm would be a "game changer".
Any of you with engineering design interests who check out the videos, especially part 2, will be disappointed. I had high hopes, especially with a supposed "clean sheet" design, but I was wrong.
The awful flimsy scope rail clamped to the barrel on the very end with two screws (imagine this with the huge scopes people need nowadays stressing the mount end, flapping about), the use of set screws holding everything together instead of the parts themselves being threaded together to secure them (example, the gas piston), springs compressing to past their design lengths and weights instead of "settling" to their design weights, the barrel pinch bolt being a huge wear issue needing to be taken in/out to clean and coming loose due to forces. They think changing it to an LH thread will solve it and tightening it to almost yield points.
Yes, being a Monday's expert is not an endearing trait but, bloody hell. Imagine the 308 version tearing itself to bits with this same design and all the extra forces, gas and stresses.
This is why the AR design, modified to a gas piston design over the DI system has been so successful, despite some people's dislike of it. It is immune to all these issues. Bugger.
Wapiti wrote:Unreal how transparent they are, hey. That isn't anything like the norm now.
It will help people decide either way whether the rifle is for them.
Towards the end there was a hint at the problems screwing everything together and securing stressed parts with loctited grubscrews - they all came loose. OK so it was a high round count and the heat was blamed. There are high temp versions of thread lockers, but the issue would be when that design makes you have to loosen them to clean the gun. I don't see that going well, and tiny Allen hex head holes being turned into round ones.
I know there are detractors to the AR pattern and I'm certain its just bias not experience with this "pattern", especially the great new piston driven AR rifles now that just dont foul the chambers at all but this design that seems to scare the politicians doesn't have these issues.
Still got high hopes, but the 308 is conspicuous by its absence.
Wapiti wrote:As an example, have a look at the evolution of the AR-pattern gas block. The pinned type. It's bomb proof.
Or the Ruger Mini-14 gas piston design. Combine the two and an orang-utan could service it with an old pair of jocks as a rag without any tools whatsoever.