bigrich wrote:yeah wow. a full enquiry into labor's jack booted behaviour . next best thing to a [i]repeal[/i] of the laws , could this possibly lead to that ? i'll be watching with interest and am wondering about MSM coverage . will the victimisation of LAFO finally be made public ? quite surprised at who supported the enquiry for sure
Wapiti wrote:Am I just suspicious of supposed conservative politicians who have already failed WA shooters already this year, spinning out what amounts to bullsh*t fairyfloss?
geoff wrote:Wapiti wrote:Am I just suspicious of supposed conservative politicians who have already failed WA shooters already this year, spinning out what amounts to bullsh*t fairyfloss?
Whilst you and I have had our fair share of disagreeance on the general topic of WA law reform.....this is something we can agree on immediately right out of the gate.
Look an inquiry is fine enough I guess. Better than no inquiry? It will just tell us what we all already know - have a look at the terms of reference.
This is the same sort of processes and machinations that gave us the 2016 Law Reform Commission report and that was a great document but has ultimately proved completely meaningless when it came to it.
Nick Goiran would sell shooters down the river in a heartbeat if he didn't think there was an electoral wedge to drive. Truly a craven, self interested politician if there ever was one. But thanks for the inquiry
Oldbloke wrote:In Vic the ALP Gov seems to have backed down or at least be re thinking the new emergency services levy in relation to farmers.
They had a pretty big rally/protest in Melbourne recently.
I wonder if shooters in WA had had a similar rally early on in the process if the Gov over in WA would have rethought the new FA Act?? We will never know I guess.
womble wrote:I read that in the purple wiggle’s voice.
Wake up Geoff. They’re coming for your guns.
This is what happens pre coffee. I should never login here first.
geoff wrote:Oldbloke wrote:In Vic the ALP Gov seems to have backed down or at least be re thinking the new emergency services levy in relation to farmers.
They had a pretty big rally/protest in Melbourne recently.
I wonder if shooters in WA had had a similar rally early on in the process if the Gov over in WA would have rethought the new FA Act?? We will never know I guess.
Another uninformed eastern states heckler
The unanimous Labor support for the review of their own flagship legislation probably signals more about people's attitudes towards Paul Papalia than their attitudes towards voters.
womble wrote:I read that in the purple wiggle’s voice.
Wake up Geoff. They’re coming for your guns.
This is what happens pre coffee. I should never login here first.
bigrich wrote:geoff wrote:Oldbloke wrote:In Vic the ALP Gov seems to have backed down or at least be re thinking the new emergency services levy in relation to farmers.
They had a pretty big rally/protest in Melbourne recently.
I wonder if shooters in WA had had a similar rally early on in the process if the Gov over in WA would have rethought the new FA Act?? We will never know I guess.
Another uninformed eastern states heckler
The unanimous Labor support for the review of their own flagship legislation probably signals more about people's attitudes towards Paul Papalia than their attitudes towards voters.
i don't find OB's post heckling at all
bigrich wrote:geoff wrote:Oldbloke wrote:In Vic the ALP Gov seems to have backed down or at least be re thinking the new emergency services levy in relation to farmers.
They had a pretty big rally/protest in Melbourne recently.
I wonder if shooters in WA had had a similar rally early on in the process if the Gov over in WA would have rethought the new FA Act?? We will never know I guess.
Another uninformed eastern states heckler
The unanimous Labor support for the review of their own flagship legislation probably signals more about people's attitudes towards Paul Papalia than their attitudes towards voters.
i don't find OB's post heckling at all
bigrich wrote:i interpreted OB's post to be a more "what if" observation than a sh!t stir against WA LAFO's . that can be the problem with internet social media , things are misinterpreted . at least that's how i see it
Wapiti wrote:bigrich wrote:geoff wrote:Oldbloke wrote:In Vic the ALP Gov seems to have backed down or at least be re thinking the new emergency services levy in relation to farmers.
They had a pretty big rally/protest in Melbourne recently.
I wonder if shooters in WA had had a similar rally early on in the process if the Gov over in WA would have rethought the new FA Act?? We will never know I guess.
Another uninformed eastern states heckler
The unanimous Labor support for the review of their own flagship legislation probably signals more about people's attitudes towards Paul Papalia than their attitudes towards voters.
i don't find OB's post heckling at all
Geoff's right, Bigrich.
"OB" knows exactly what went on in WA, the low-turnout rallies and how shooters representatives warned people off mass-meeting in case of "nazi infiltrators".
He followed every post on it and also commented on every post.
He IS sh*t-stirring, looking for a reaction and some attention without committing to anything as usual.
Yes, farmers, as I said in WA about the black fellas BS, farmers will not be f**ked over, and in Vic it's only just started. Let alone the Labor c**ts stealing our SMSF farms off us with "unrealised gains".
Like the wind factory up north from here we jumped on and got cancelled, the 202-turbine one we just got hit with here in Stanthorpe aint going to go ahead either, can promise you that. I am off today getting support, and it just isn't happening.
I get completely that Geoff is touchy about it, but there is a BIG lesson to be learned from WA and people must wake up that what happened was a complete f**kup.
It is worth remembering that those who don't learn from history's mistakes are destined to repeat them. Eastern states hecklers, take note.
womble wrote:
I haven’t followed it that closely.
But no public rally rally was a good call.
The media would have picked out the dumbest looking attendee they could find to interview and crucified us.
They would bury us.
Neo nazis gate crashing. I don’t know if they’d make the trip from out east. But yes it’s a genuine risk. They do hijack rallies and public events.
It’s not uncommon nowadays for public rallies to have their events hijacked by organised groups with their own agendas
Too great a risk. Next minute sky news is showing angry gravy seals in maga hats .
Impressions matter. Public image matters. And we wouldn’t have that control. The media would.
It’s good to know there are some wise people behind the scenes making these decisions.