by Wapiti » 24 Aug 2025, 8:15 am
If there is a mechanically designed safety function in a firearms design, it is indeed safe to carry a firearm with a loaded chamber.
It is only naivety, or lack of knowledge both in opinion and needed/best use, that makes this a problem for some people.
So, a modern revolver with all cylinders loaded and uncocked, with a transfer bar design that makes it impossible to fire unless deliberate cocked/trigger pulled, isn't safe?
A semi-auto pistol with external hammer and manual decock function, with the hammer down over the transfer bar, and a round in the chamber, isn't safe?
A firearm with a half-cock function where even if you dropped it on the hammer itself or belted it with something, has no mechanical direct link to the firing pin, not safe?
Where the firing mechanism has no stored energy to fire the round, because the firearm mechanism isn't cocked?
And it's design blocks any kind of energy transfer at that condition?
I'm not talking about a bolt gun, pump gun, under/over etc where the firing pin is under full spring pressure, held back by the sear which is blocked by a safety catch detent position. Where the firing pin is hovering with all that stored energy, over the primer. Held back only by an interlock or block design safety. In that case, no it's not the same thing.
All firearms should be in a condition of "chamber empty" when not in use, or about to be used. Absolutely agree.
But some circumstances, like the OP described, IS "in use", and some mechanical designs make this condition completely safe if used by individuals with understanding and comprehension of the designs suitable for this condition of use.
Regards G,
AKA Dr. Doolittle