

MG5150 wrote:Here is some footage with the Mars 1000 for those who were asking
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=P ... KvN0-BCmAN
I've only ever seen two foxes come out on our block in over 20+ nights sitting gon the shed roof... managed to have 4 coming out and get every single one

MG5150 wrote:There are a number of smaller thermal cameras (that tend to plug into your smartphone and turn them into thermals) not specific to hunting that electricians and electrical repair device technicians can use to find short circuits. Is this what you mean rather than the hunting ones?

ColdStart wrote:MG5150 wrote:Here is some footage with the Mars 1000 for those who were asking
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=P ... KvN0-BCmAN
I've only ever seen two foxes come out on our block in over 20+ nights sitting gon the shed roof... managed to have 4 coming out and get every single one
Thanks for the footage, looks good. I have a IR scope already but what I don't like about it is finding animals in it is a pain in the ass, added to that is the focus plane is small and you need to refocus a lot while scanning. I was thinking of getting a thermal monocular, but figured just get a scope and be done with it and carrying extra stuff.
How do you find the focus plane? do you need to re focus a lot? I guess the difference between a IR and thermal is I need to refocus to find the animal in the first place and with a thermal I can refocus once I get a heat signature, which would be way way better.


Wapiti wrote:Actually, a mate and I went for a drive with the archaic 75 watt HID lightforce on the buggy, you know, the kind of run where you are looking at real images on the back of your eyeball. Rather than looking at an image on a tablet or the screen on your fancypants Ranger's TV-sized screen dash by wifi.
And crash into a stump.
I had forgotten how fast and easy and actually spot-on precise the exercise was. We cleaned up. Those of you who can't afford $X,XXX for a thermal that will be superseded in a years time, and your cat-litter-tray-liner shooting mag's ads will remind you of such, don't despair.




Wapiti wrote:Actually, a mate and I went for a drive with the archaic 75 watt HID lightforce on the buggy, you know, the kind of run where you are looking at real images on the back of your eyeball. Rather than looking at an image on a tablet or the screen on your fancypants Ranger's TV-sized screen dash by wifi.
And crash into a stump.
I had forgotten how fast and easy and actually spot-on precise the exercise was. We cleaned up. Those of you who can't afford $X,XXX for a thermal that will be superseded in a years time, and your cat-litter-tray-liner shooting mag's ads will remind you of such, don't despair.


Wapiti wrote:You mightn't have seen it mate but I have.
Coincidentally, not so long ago in a local gun shop customers and the two staff were discussing their gear doing just that, thermal on a spotty remote and wifi'ing to the vehicles screen. But hey, we're just straw chewin' country bumpkins right?
You don't have to be a smart @rse just because you haven't, either. Maybe some people get out more that you, eh?

Wapiti wrote:You mightn't have seen it mate but I have.
Coincidentally, not so long ago in a local gun shop customers and the two staff were discussing their gear doing just that, thermal on a spotty remote and wifi'ing to the vehicles screen. But hey, we're just straw chewin' country bumpkins right?
You don't have to be a smart @rse just because you haven't, either. Maybe some people get out more that you, eh?

MG5150 wrote:
If you've already got a NV unit I'd get a thermal monocular to help you spot the animals then try to pick them up with the NV and shoot.
If you've got enough dosh to get a monocular and a thernal scope then you're laughing.
You don't really want to be trying to use your rifle scope to scan and find the animals as you'll tire yourself out really quickly.

mchughcb wrote:Wapiti wrote:You mightn't have seen it mate but I have.
Coincidentally, not so long ago in a local gun shop customers and the two staff were discussing their gear doing just that, thermal on a spotty remote and wifi'ing to the vehicles screen. But hey, we're just straw chewin' country bumpkins right?
You don't have to be a smart @rse just because you haven't, either. Maybe some people get out more that you, eh?
I don't know I don't drive a Range Rover or know anybody that does.

ColdStart wrote:mchughcb wrote:Wapiti wrote:You mightn't have seen it mate but I have.
Coincidentally, not so long ago in a local gun shop customers and the two staff were discussing their gear doing just that, thermal on a spotty remote and wifi'ing to the vehicles screen. But hey, we're just straw chewin' country bumpkins right?
You don't have to be a smart @rse just because you haven't, either. Maybe some people get out more that you, eh?
I don't know I don't drive a Range Rover or know anybody that does.
I think when he said Ranger, he was referring to the Ford Ranger aka the new commodore/falcon, not Range Rovers

ColdStart wrote:
I was thinking of that, but they aren't much cheaper and I saw you can use Mars 1000 like this in any case that is why I am thinking of getting it.

ColdStart wrote:MG5150 wrote:Here is some footage with the Mars 1000 for those who were asking
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=P ... KvN0-BCmAN
I've only ever seen two foxes come out on our block in over 20+ nights sitting gon the shed roof... managed to have 4 coming out and get every single one
Thanks for the footage, looks good. I have a IR scope already but what I don't like about it is finding animals in it is a pain in the ass, added to that is the focus plane is small and you need to refocus a lot while scanning. I was thinking of getting a thermal monocular, but figured just get a scope and be done with it and carrying extra stuff.
How do you find the focus plane? do you need to re focus a lot? I guess the difference between a IR and thermal is I need to refocus to find the animal in the first place and with a thermal I can refocus once I get a heat signature, which would be way way better.
