




Jackaroo wrote:“So, we don’t have photographs, no site plans, no measurements, no recovery of projectiles, no exact location, no blood spatter analysis, none of the things that we would normally get at any crime scene and if you add to that, we don’t have access to the deceased so no post-mortem.”
Witch hunt much????




Jackaroo wrote:“So, we don’t have photographs, no site plans, no measurements, no recovery of projectiles, no exact location, no blood spatter analysis, none of the things that we would normally get at any crime scene and if you add to that, we don’t have access to the deceased so no post-mortem.”
Witch hunt much????


No1_49er wrote:Perhaps some of the posters on this forum, who are feigning incredulity that somebody from Australia's military service, a VC recipient no less, should reflect on the fact that the good citizens of Germany once thought that Josef Mengele and his ilk were also thought to have done no wrong.
Ben Roberts-Smith tried, and failed, to sue for defamation.
He failed. And an attempt to pursue the matter in a higher appellate court also failed
It seems that despite some here decrying the evidence of Afghan citizens with the suggestion that their country of origin somehow makes them unworthy of being heard, some of his own military compatriots have given evidence against him.
Perhaps it's time to chill, and let the courts of justice preside?
Kangaroo Court? Well, it is Australian.



No1_49er wrote:Perhaps some of the posters on this forum, who are feigning incredulity that somebody from Australia's military service, a VC recipient no less, should reflect on the fact that the good citizens of Germany once thought that Josef Mengele and his ilk were also thought to have done no wrong.
Ben Roberts-Smith tried, and failed, to sue for defamation.
He failed. And an attempt to pursue the matter in a higher appellate court also failed
It seems that despite some here decrying the evidence of Afghan citizens with the suggestion that their country of origin somehow makes them unworthy of being heard, some of his own military compatriots have given evidence against him.
Perhaps it's time to chill, and let the courts of justice preside?
Kangaroo Court? Well, it is Australian.

bigrich wrote:No1_49er wrote:Perhaps some of the posters on this forum, who are feigning incredulity that somebody from Australia's military service, a VC recipient no less, should reflect on the fact that the good citizens of Germany once thought that Josef Mengele and his ilk were also thought to have done no wrong.
Ben Roberts-Smith tried, and failed, to sue for defamation.
He failed. And an attempt to pursue the matter in a higher appellate court also failed
It seems that despite some here decrying the evidence of Afghan citizens with the suggestion that their country of origin somehow makes them unworthy of being heard, some of his own military compatriots have given evidence against him.
Perhaps it's time to chill, and let the courts of justice preside?
Kangaroo Court? Well, it is Australian.
you have some good points , but from what i've seen of the past and current situation , somebody's out to get him . totally unnecessary to arrest him getting off a plane in front of his kids , he and his lawyer already stated if required he'd surrender himself at a police station . the very public arrest with media in attendance was done for vindictive reasons



Die Judicii wrote:I don't know all the ins and outs with this,,,,,,,, but one single question is yelling in my head.
Don't we have the "Double Jeopardy" situation any more in the courts of Australia ?

No1_49er wrote:Yes, we do.
Why the question?
Can you provide details of the first trial?

Die Judicii wrote:No1_49er wrote:Yes, we do.
Why the question?
Can you provide details of the first trial?
No I can’t, but if he’s already been on trial for it all once, how can they start it all up again now ? Doesn’t that fly in the face of the Double Jeopardy ruling ?



bigrich wrote:well , like a lot of you i feel that BRS is going through a witch hunt, and i'll support ADF members who've served our country . BUT , i try to keep a open mind . please watch the following opinion piece by andrew bolt, as he goes into a few things i didn't know or had considered . interesting opinion on AUKUS at the end . why would the US sell us nuclear subs when we've given no support to the US with this iran situation ? have billions of taxpayer dollars been thrown away again on subs we won't get ?
Wise and balanced words from Andrew Bolt.
https://www.skynews.com.au/opinion/andr ... 806d64d37b

mchughcb wrote:$25M on lawyers and he still lost. Evidence must have been strong.





Wapiti wrote:They don't have video of BRS executing anybody.
He is the bloke who's been arrested.
Edit - correct me if I'm wrong and feel free to post up a link to it.
I am looking forward to this sickening cowardly witch hunt going to a trial before jury, which this will be shown to be that, without completely conclusive evidence and a body, on the say so of completely discredited witnesses who took money for comment, and it being complete say-so.
And this skipping stone - hearing evidence that certain men who are above anyone who speak down about them who weren't there, when in court the truth comes out that from up above, assassination hits were handed out about certain terrorists that had murdered Aussie soldiers and civilians and given to men just doing their job.
For this to deflect to the hidden officers who, from way up top, ordered these hits.
We all know about the terrorists with shoot-to-kill orders out on them, in war, who threw their guns down, stood up and said "you can't kill me now, the rules of war say I am not to be hurt. I am now unarmed" and expected the hits not to take place from those with the stomachs to do their job instead of narking on their mates like dogs?

bigrich wrote:Wapiti wrote:They don't have video of BRS executing anybody.
He is the bloke who's been arrested.
Edit - correct me if I'm wrong and feel free to post up a link to it.
I am looking forward to this sickening cowardly witch hunt going to a trial before jury, which this will be shown to be that, without completely conclusive evidence and a body, on the say so of completely discredited witnesses who took money for comment, and it being complete say-so.
And this skipping stone - hearing evidence that certain men who are above anyone who speak down about them who weren't there, when in court the truth comes out that from up above, assassination hits were handed out about certain terrorists that had murdered Aussie soldiers and civilians and given to men just doing their job.
For this to deflect to the hidden officers who, from way up top, ordered these hits.
We all know about the terrorists with shoot-to-kill orders out on them, in war, who threw their guns down, stood up and said "you can't kill me now, the rules of war say I am not to be hurt. I am now unarmed" and expected the hits not to take place from those with the stomachs to do their job instead of narking on their mates like dogs?
war is war . a dirty business where what needs to be done , and what is done , is a vastly different circumstance to those sitting in judgement in "civilised society", passing judgement . we're talking about the SAS after all . they do the job others can't stomach . foreign special forces have a code of silence that permits them to operate to do the dirty jobs that get results . i'd love to hear about taliban executions and torture of civilians to put things into context . BRS would be a saint compared to some of these terrorists i'm sure
british commandoes during WW2 and green berets in vietnam would've performed tasks outside of the geneva convention . but those countries respect and look after their elite troops . who'd want to join our military now ? stuff happens during war and our serving members get thrown under the bus . disgusting
