Rear bag vs firm "V" rear shooting rest

Equipment and accessories for shooting. Safes, firearm storage, bipods, carry cases, slings etc.

Rear bag vs firm "V" rear shooting rest

Post by buster » 28 Dec 2013, 8:07 pm

I don't know what the proper name for the for the "V" rear shooting rest I'm talking about, but I mean this style of rest.

caldwell-rear-shooting-rest.jpg
caldwell rear shooting rest
caldwell-rear-shooting-rest.jpg (33.68 KiB) Viewed 5322 times


You know the kind...

Question is, do you guys prefer a firm "V" style bag like this which is firm? Or a soft bean bag type rest for the back?

And why?
Mossberg MVP Varmint .223 Rem
Nikon Buckmaster 4.5-14x40

Howa 1500 Stainless .308 Win
Nikon Buckmaster 3-9x40
User avatar
buster
Private
Private
 
Posts: 89
New South Wales

Re: Rear bag vs firm "V" rear shooting rest

Post by Old Fart » 28 Dec 2013, 8:16 pm

There is movement in either one, the firm "V" rest as you call them or an actual bag.

A bag is less restrictive and more flexible than the hard leather rests IMO, which can get a bit of a pain to work with if you're aiming from the rear as they don't let you move side to side much.
Winchester Model 70 Featherweight - .270 Winchester Short Magnum
Uberti 1873 Short Rifle - .45 Colt
Winchester Model 70 Coyote Varmint - .22-250 Remington
User avatar
Old Fart
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 261
South Australia

Re: Rear bag vs firm "V" rear shooting rest

Post by Chronos » 28 Dec 2013, 8:32 pm

Depends of what the rifle likes and also what kind of front rest you are using.

If your shooting off a bipod in the field or at the range you can induce elevation changes by squeezing the rear bag or a shooting sock bag. Griff gear make a good one used by tactical shooters

If your target shooting of a coaxial benchrest style front rest your rear bag could be a firm "rabbit ears" bag like you pictured. Some rear bags are massive (like SEB Bigfoot) and are quite heavy but they stay put while the front rest makes the adjustments.

Chronos
User avatar
Chronos
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2081
New South Wales

Re: Rear bag vs firm "V" rear shooting rest

Post by Lorgar » 29 Dec 2013, 8:37 am

I used a bunnie ears rear bag and an adjustable front rest now (A Caldwell Rock Jr.)

Don't have it with me at the moment but I think the rear bag is a Champion brand one? It's thick leather and quite firm.

Once I dial in the elevation on the front rest, to aim I'm basically just resting a thumb on the back of the stock and my finger on the trigger, and just more my shoulder side to side lightly to adjust left/right before taking the shot.

The light movement of the shoulder is enough and I'm not gripping and wobbling the rifle with my hand. Just holding it enough to squeeze the trigger when I'm on the bullseye.
User avatar
Lorgar
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2175
Victoria

Re: Rear bag vs firm "V" rear shooting rest

Post by Pom » 29 Dec 2013, 11:36 am

buster wrote:Question is, do you guys prefer a firm "V" style bag like this which is firm? Or a soft bean bag type rest for the back?

And why?


Personally I prefer the loose bean bag style for the rear rest.

Easier to move where you need it and you just flex the bag a little to stiffen it up a bit if it need be for the shot.

I've used the bunny ears ones a few times and found I was always jiggering the rear bag left and right. This is only with a bipod though, if you had a front rest with windage adjustment it wouldn't be an issue,
Remington 700 VTR in .308 WIn
Winchester Model 1873 in .44-40
Sako A7 in 243 Win
User avatar
Pom
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 121
Queensland

Re: Rear bag vs firm "V" rear shooting rest

Post by Blackened » 29 Dec 2013, 11:40 am

Pom wrote:I've used the bunny ears ones a few times and found I was always jiggering the rear bag left and right. This is only with a bipod though, if you had a front rest with windage adjustment it wouldn't be an issue.


True, not many people shelling out for windage adjustable front rests though from what I see at the range.

No surprise really as they start at $350 or whatever for an entry level one like the Caldwell.
User avatar
Blackened
Moderator
 
New South Wales

Re: Rear bag vs firm "V" rear shooting rest

Post by Chronos » 29 Dec 2013, 3:27 pm

Blackened wrote:
Pom wrote:I've used the bunny ears ones a few times and found I was always jiggering the rear bag left and right. This is only with a bipod though, if you had a front rest with windage adjustment it wouldn't be an issue.


True, not many people shelling out for windage adjustable front rests though from what I see at the range.

No surprise really as they start at $350 or whatever for an entry level one like the Caldwell.


To be honest, don't even bother with a Caldwell for any kind of precision benchrest shooting.

There are plenty of competition shooting off rests that cost closer to $1500 than $1000. Just try ordering one and see the waiting lists. A lot make do with one of butch lamberts SEA coaxial tops on a Caldwell BR bases but even these tops cost more than $300

And a decent Seb rear bag costs more than $100 :(

Chronos
User avatar
Chronos
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2081
New South Wales

Re: Rear bag vs firm "V" rear shooting rest

Post by feedr » 29 Dec 2013, 3:31 pm

Chronos wrote:There are plenty of competition shooting off rests that cost closer to $1,500 than $1,000. Just try ordering one and see the waiting lists.


I'd say wow, but I suppose it isn't really a surprise.

Wish I had $1,500 to blow on a rest. I would get murdered by the wife :lol:
Tikka T3 Lite Stainless in .308 Winchester.
User avatar
feedr
Private
Private
 
Posts: 72
New South Wales

Re: Rear bag vs firm "V" rear shooting rest

Post by Chronos » 29 Dec 2013, 5:20 pm

feedr wrote:
Chronos wrote:There are plenty of competition shooting off rests that cost closer to $1,500 than $1,000. Just try ordering one and see the waiting lists.


I'd say wow, but I suppose it isn't really a surprise.

Wish I had $1,500 to blow on a rest. I would get murdered by the wife :lol:



Remember that those guys have already spent $4000-5000 on a rifle and $2000-$3000 on a scope plus they may have a rimfire BR gun too.

It's a whole different world, and you thought the F class guys were serious. Lol

Chronos
User avatar
Chronos
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2081
New South Wales

Re: Rear bag vs firm "V" rear shooting rest

Post by Utcherd » 29 Dec 2013, 7:49 pm

Chronos wrote:Remember that those guys have already spent $4000-5000 on a rifle and $2000-$3000 on a scope plus they may have a rimfire BR gun too.


Sssh.

Makes me sad that I don't have that gear :lol:
User avatar
Utcherd
Private
Private
 
Posts: 81
New South Wales


Back to top
 
Return to Shooting accessories and equipment