AussieCapitalist wrote:Why would I use google maps and let some machine tell me where to drive? There is a little book you can buy that has street maps inside of it. I am sure you all have seen them before.
Sergeant Hartman wrote:I haven't downloaded it...i need to remember to keep my Bluetooth off.
Raband wrote:I've got 4 kids, a grandaughter and two elderly parents that I care for/about.daily.
To me the app is a no-brainer if it can help protect them even indirectly.
Not everything is some nefarious scheme by men in black to invade our privacy, steal our data and track us.
If, as a worst case scenario, my tracking data falls into wrong hands (very unlikely and nothing that couldn't be gotten through other means) so what?
Honestly, they'd be welcome to it during this crisis if it'd help protect my loved ones.
Ohhh, I went to xxxxxxxx shop today, stopped at yyyyyyyy servo. Whoop-de-farking-do.
If I was heading somewhere/doing something I was concerned about then the phone shouldn't be with me anyway if !I wss concerned about 3rd party surveilence (it won't be the covid app that trips me up)
TassieTiger wrote:But HOW is it really, truly going to help? That’s the real issue for me .
marksman wrote:it does nothing for you or your family's health if you are going to get it you have got it and already passed it on before you are notified eg... up to 14 days before you show symptoms
Raband wrote:8 workers found infected at a meat processing factory today
Imagine if the person who infected the initial worker had been using the app, as had the worker and they were able to jump in and head off that worker going to work til tested. Able to get the worker teasted prior to having to wait 2 weeks or so til they show symptoms (if they even show)
Imagine if this was after lockdown and each of the 8 workers went to different pubs, restaurants, parties, houses etc.
Yep - it will do nothing for me or my families health if I've already got it and infected them, but it could definitely help others I came into contact with before I was diagnosed find out they may be a risk to their families health before they pass it on til such stage as they are diagnosed.
People will be able to head back out into society soon as lockdowns are lifted - I, for one, would rather find out I'd been in contact with a carrier via the app as soon as I can rather than a fortnight later when I start coughing and after I'd visited friends and family.
Lol at aggressive - if someone infects a loved one when it could have been easily avoided yep - I'll glare at them menacingly
trekin wrote:I would be very weary of any news story that reports lke this:
"A COVID-19 cluster has emerged at a Victorian meat processing facility after eight employees tested positive for the potentially deadly disease.
Three staff are among the seven new cases of coronavirus recorded overnight, taking the total number of infections in Victoria to 1,371."
"The Melbourne business has been closed for cleaning as all staff members undergo testing and contact tracing is conducted.
There are no current concerns for food safety, Mikakos said.
She said it was not department policy to provide the name of the facility as they did not believe there was a public health risk."
And yet the department has no qualms naming age care facilities, health care facilities or anywhere else 'real' outbreaks occur.
By helping track and trace possible infection vectors and get ahead of a fresh outbreak/cluster.
Trying to work back where an infected person had been the prior 2 weeks and who they may have come into contact with off only their memory is next to impossible.
It's not real time, not going to warn me to stay away from Bunnings etc - it will just give the docs and scientists a fairly decent tool to help them in their fight.
That and the increase in free public testing (already started where I am) could well be the thing that saves one or many of those I care about.
Lets say I undertook testing on Weds at the local supermarket carpark (one of the local stations for swabs) and turn out to be infected - that allows (via the app) any number of people to be warned that they may indeed be at risk from me and to take appropriate measures to avoid infecting others.
TassieTiger doesn't have the app, doesn't get any warning that he was in contact with me and goes his merry way for the next fortnight infecting family, friends, coworkers, strangers, shopkeepers, customers etc, who each go about their business infecting others.
Going to become even more critical once lockdowns are eased and movements increase.
Personally, I'd hate to have to live with myself if someone got infected or even worse due to a visit from me if I was infected without my knoweledge of having come into contact with some random stranger - even more so if I could have been warned of that contact a week ealier if only I'd been using the app.
For me it's an easy choice/download because I'm not making it about ME, not about MY DATA, MY PRIVACY etc - for me it's about doing my best to look out for others
edit: Can tell you one thing - if someone infects one of my kids, grandkids or parents because they were too pig headed to download a simple app that would have given them prior warning not to go visiting - any tinfoil fears or personal stances on data protection, big brother etc will fade into insignificance compared to what they need to fear from me
TassieTiger wrote:.
So, you have the app installed but get infected without knowing it (hundreds of ways this can happen - someone coughs on a product you pick up, someone doesn’t have their phone on them or turned on, etc etc) - But the issue now is - you had the app, it didn’t alarm, so you feel safe. It your know spreading it everywhere...how does that help your family?