
womble wrote:https://www.theage.com.au/national/western-australia/more-than-100-guns-seized-in-police-raids-on-sovereign-citizens-20250930-p5mz2e.html
Pretty sure this is underway nationwide.
Tyranny incarnate.
I don't support the views of sovcits.
But who decides what defines a sovcit.
Does speaking against the government of the day make you an enemy of the state now.

bigrich wrote:womble wrote:https://www.theage.com.au/national/western-australia/more-than-100-guns-seized-in-police-raids-on-sovereign-citizens-20250930-p5mz2e.html
Pretty sure this is underway nationwide.
Tyranny incarnate.
I don't support the views of sovcits.
But who decides what defines a sovcit.
Does speaking against the government of the day make you an enemy of the state now.
very worrying . speak against/criticize the government and have your firearms taken from you even though no crime has been committed . doesn't really support freedom of speech and thought in a supposedly democratic free country des it . could my firearms license be at risk for even typing this post ?
again, very worrying .


Billo wrote:Sadly, some of those identifying as Sovereign citizens who reject authority have brought this action upon themselves.
There is no right to a firearms licence and if youre either too stupid or mentally deficient then I have no issue here


womble wrote:
But the media controls the narrative and keeps you focused elsewhere. Whatever outrage they can entice you with.

Billo wrote:Sadly, some of those identifying as Sovereign citizens who reject authority have brought this action upon themselves.
There is no right to a firearms licence and if youre either too stupid or mentally deficient then I have no issue here

womble wrote:Billo wrote:Sadly, some of those identifying as Sovereign citizens who reject authority have brought this action upon themselves.
There is no right to a firearms licence and if youre either too stupid or mentally deficient then I have no issue here
How do we know they identified as sovereign citizens.
Or were they identified as sovereign citizens.
Raids were conducted on these people. And yet they didn’t defend themselves with their guns. They surrendered their guns. No resistance. No arrests. No laws broken.
So were they actually a threat.

bigrich wrote:Billo wrote:Sadly, some of those identifying as Sovereign citizens who reject authority have brought this action upon themselves.
There is no right to a firearms licence and if youre either too stupid or mentally deficient then I have no issue here
umm yeah , where does it stop ? does anyone who has political objection's or post something "anti-guv'ment " become a target

Billo wrote:bigrich wrote:Billo wrote:Sadly, some of those identifying as Sovereign citizens who reject authority have brought this action upon themselves.
There is no right to a firearms licence and if youre either too stupid or mentally deficient then I have no issue here
umm yeah , where does it stop ? does anyone who has political objection's or post something "anti-guv'ment " become a target
The Police regularly deny those associated with Bikies and other criminals on the ground of not being of good character, this is no different



ColdStart wrote:
People think what I posted above is nonsense because they don't understand the law. They think we have the "right" to firearms, you don't its at the government grace and has been for a long time.


ColdStart wrote:A firearms prohibition order can in Victoria be issued and your firearms seized for just about any reason, such as
You smile to much
You're to happy
You associate with people we don't like
You hold religious views we don't like.
You attended a protest
Most people don't understand this or the fact the Police don't need to tell you why its even been issued.
People think what I posted above is nonsense because they don't understand the law. They think we have the "right" to firearms, you don't its at the government grace and has been for a long time.

Billo wrote:ColdStart wrote:A firearms prohibition order can in Victoria be issued and your firearms seized for just about any reason, such as
You smile to much
You're to happy
You associate with people we don't like
You hold religious views we don't like.
You attended a protest
Most people don't understand this or the fact the Police don't need to tell you why its even been issued.
People think what I posted above is nonsense because they don't understand the law. They think we have the "right" to firearms, you don't its at the government grace and has been for a long time.
mate you have No credibility with this post, I;d suggest you pull your head in![]()
![]()


MG5150 wrote:Were they confiscating legally owned and registered firearms from people who identify as SC?
Or were they doing raids of SC properties and finding illegally owned or unregistered firearms?
Gun owners known for espousing sovereign-citizen ideology were targeted in the five-day operation last week across metropolitan and regional WA.

ColdStart wrote:Billo wrote:ColdStart wrote:A firearms prohibition order can in Victoria be issued and your firearms seized for just about any reason, such as
You smile to much
You're to happy
You associate with people we don't like
You hold religious views we don't like.
You attended a protest
Most people don't understand this or the fact the Police don't need to tell you why its even been issued.
People think what I posted above is nonsense because they don't understand the law. They think we have the "right" to firearms, you don't its at the government grace and has been for a long time.
mate you have No credibility with this post, I;d suggest you pull your head in![]()
![]()
I know no more than whats been reported, feel free to post up something thats supports your delusional rantings
Seeing you imply you know so much, what grounds can a FPO be issued on? show us this credibility you claim to have and I don't , point out why I am wrong
.

Billo wrote:I know no more than whats been reported, feel free to post up something thats supports your delusional rantings
mate you have No credibility with this post, I;d suggest you pull your head in![]()
![]()

ColdStart wrote:Billo wrote:I know no more than whats been reported, feel free to post up something thats supports your delusional rantings
You can try and backtrack as much as you want you're the one that claimedmate you have No credibility with this post, I;d suggest you pull your head in![]()
![]()
Now your saying you know no nothing than been reported,
My post wasn't directly about what has been reported, My post was about the fact in Victoria a FPO can be issued for any behavior the police don't like. and yes its that broad.
It was a comment on the broad powers that police often have.
So what are you going on about? you claimed I had no credibility and to pull my head in and when asked why you post complete nonsense, are you drunk? .

Billo wrote:Sorry but you have ZERO creibilty, Feel free to keep on waffling, no one care what you have to say

ColdStart wrote:Billo wrote:Sorry but you have ZERO creibilty, Feel free to keep on waffling, no one care what you have to say
Clearly you do, as you quoted me numerous times.
Once again, you claim I have no creibilty* yet you offer no reason. Are you being deliberately obtuse
*credibility is the word I think you mean.

Billo wrote:ColdStart wrote:Billo wrote:Sorry but you have ZERO creibilty, Feel free to keep on waffling, no one care what you have to say
Clearly you do, as you quoted me numerous times.
Once again, you claim I have no creibilty* yet you offer no reason. Are you being deliberately obtuse
*credibility is the word I think you mean.
You keep on high lighting your own Stupidity, just hand your licence back

ColdStart wrote:Billo wrote:ColdStart wrote:Billo wrote:Sorry but you have ZERO creibilty, Feel free to keep on waffling, no one care what you have to say
Clearly you do, as you quoted me numerous times.
Once again, you claim I have no creibilty* yet you offer no reason. Are you being deliberately obtuse
*credibility is the word I think you mean.
You keep on high lighting your own Stupidity, just hand your licence back
So you got nothing, not surprising really.
There is a word for when someone has nothing to back up up what they claim it called credibility, I sure you have heard of it

bigrich wrote:womble wrote:
But the media controls the narrative and keeps you focused elsewhere. Whatever outrage they can entice you with.
gaza anyone ?global warming/net zero

womble wrote:bigrich wrote:womble wrote:
But the media controls the narrative and keeps you focused elsewhere. Whatever outrage they can entice you with.
gaza anyone ?global warming/net zero
Those aren’t examples of manufactured outrage.
We know the Israeli forces target children because we have Australian doctors over there.
We know they are starving the population because our aid dose’nt get through.
Personally I don’t care. I support Israel because no Jew wants to chop of my head. Can’t really say the same for Islam.
We know the sea levels are rising because we’ve been measuring for decades. Tide gauges, argo floats, ice measurements for decades.
Indisputable evidence of a consistent rise at an accelerating rate.
We even have satellites taking measurements with lazers nowadays.
Manufactured outrage is claiming climate change is a hoax.
To protect the fossil fuel industry. This is what newscorp was created for. This is what sky news at night provides to protect these industries and create public scorn for any alternatives. Destroy competition to their industry.


Billo wrote:Your mate Dezi has most likely necked himslef from shame, go away child

bigrich wrote:billo and coldstart , your mud slinging is achieving nothing . please stick to intelligent debate . i disagree with womble on topics , but we put forward our views in a respectful manner . we do take the p!ss out of each other occasionally , no insult intended

ColdStart wrote:bigrich wrote:billo and coldstart , your mud slinging is achieving nothing . please stick to intelligent debate . i disagree with womble on topics , but we put forward our views in a respectful manner . we do take the p!ss out of each other occasionally , no insult intended
There has been no mud slinging or disrespect from me, I truly believed Billo was drunk posting, but after his last post he is clearly arguing with his own delusional fantasy on what he thinks I believe without even bothering to ask or read what I have said.
Its hard to argue with a delusional fantasy in his head.

