

No1Mk3 wrote:bigrich wrote:deye243 wrote:Limit of 5 . psychological test every licence renewal that will be extremely problematic because extremely expensive and probably takes 12 months to get to see one of these head Shrinks and probably voluntary monitoring of your social media I don't think these grubs have anything off the table and all the rest of the Retarded stuff from Western Australia like storing bolts separate no folding stocks empty cases classified as loaded ammunition you know all that brain dead moron stuff that doesn't make anybody any safer it's just an excuse to take guns of people
empty cases classed as loaded ammunition ? FFS are they serious ?
It used to be the case in WA but is no longer. Nothing is off the table now, however. Sense has flown out the window and we are about to be reamed, absolutely nothing can or will be done to stop it. I know already my collection is toast unless I emigrate, and they may even prevent that happening throught AG and Defence requirements to take firearms overseas.

MG5150 wrote:very disappointed to see that the SSAA, ADA and a few other groups are posting a statement saying they wish to work with the government on firearms changes instead of calling it out as bulls**t and telling them to get to the real issue.
Comments are turned off of course so people can't tell them what they really thing.

MG5150 wrote:very disappointed to see that the SSAA, ADA and a few other groups are posting a statement saying they wish to work with the government on firearms changes instead of calling it out as bulls**t and telling them to get to the real issue.
Comments are turned off of course so people can't tell them what they really thing.

Cape_Yorkee wrote:MG5150 wrote:very disappointed to see that the SSAA, ADA and a few other groups are posting a statement saying they wish to work with the government on firearms changes instead of calling it out as bulls**t and telling them to get to the real issue.
Comments are turned off of course so people can't tell them what they really thing.
I think you'll find SSAA are playing it smart by getting themselves to the table to try and address this rubbish. I'm sure there'll be changes across the board, but trying to work in with state and Feds to limit what changes are in front of us sounds logical to me. Jumping up and down like meat ants and trying to work against the grain won't get anyone far. There's a lot at stake here for all of us.

Wapiti wrote:And another one for wobble.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpDAwqxYDBU

bigrich wrote:Cape_Yorkee wrote:MG5150 wrote:very disappointed to see that the SSAA, ADA and a few other groups are posting a statement saying they wish to work with the government on firearms changes instead of calling it out as bulls**t and telling them to get to the real issue.
Comments are turned off of course so people can't tell them what they really thing.
I think you'll find SSAA are playing it smart by getting themselves to the table to try and address this rubbish. I'm sure there'll be changes across the board, but trying to work in with state and Feds to limit what changes are in front of us sounds logical to me. Jumping up and down like meat ants and trying to work against the grain won't get anyone far. There's a lot at stake here for all of us.
that's the strategically smart thing to do , shooters union is taking the same approach from what i can tell . i've seen a uptick in news stories and opinions from some senators shifting focus from gun laws to the failings of police and intelligence services . things are very fluid , but i'm hopeful of a better outcome than i initially thought .


ederlezi wrote:Wapiti wrote:And another one for wobble.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpDAwqxYDBU
That was actually pretty good!





Yoda wrote:So I'm thinking were about to see a 10 limit on the number of firearms we can have. These second hand firearms will flood the market causing a crash in rifle prices. This will hurt gun shops selling new rifles. How do you think this will play out?

deye243 wrote:That moron minns is recalling parliament to bring in the new laws before Christmas for Christ's sake can you imagine what a dog's breakfast they're going to be with blanket bans and no leeway you know early next year you'll have had your guns stolen off you regardless of whether they give you money for them or not it's still theft and then 12 months later you'll be able to have something the same or similar it's happened before


Terraincognita wrote:Queensland deputy premier says Queensland only signing on for limiting the number of firearms a licensee can own.Didn’t give a number but if this is the only change not a bad result for Queenslanders. But we’ll wait and see.

Terraincognita wrote:Queensland deputy premier says Queensland only signing on for limiting the number of firearms a licensee can own.Didn’t give a number but if this is the only change not a bad result for Queenslanders. But we’ll wait and see.



alexjones wrote:I spent 4k on ammo today. Going back tomorrow to get more and more magazines.



alexjones wrote:I spent 4k on ammo today. Going back tomorrow to get more and more magazines.

alexjones wrote:Terraincognita wrote:Queensland deputy premier says Queensland only signing on for limiting the number of firearms a licensee can own.Didn’t give a number but if this is the only change not a bad result for Queenslanders. But we’ll wait and see.
Not a bad result? I own nearly 50 guns. I am going to get raped here!!!
Lets see if I can move them to my collector licence.

bigrich wrote:alexjones wrote:I spent 4k on ammo today. Going back tomorrow to get more and more magazines.
mate , i don't have a problem with you having 50 guns , but to play devil's advocate , the average citizen would be shocked. i know people who know little or nothing about guns, when i explain to them about different calibres for different uses, they get it. you and i understand that a firearm is a inanimate object, that it takes a human to pull a trigger, that's lost on the average citizen , more guns equals more danger is their mindset . i'm not defending or advocating law changes, but you seem pretty p!ssed off so i thought i'd reach out put a perspective to why the government must act in response to the general populations concerns . i'm not spending any more money on guns until i see concrete detail on changes . thankfully the LNP has only confirmed changes to the number of firearms at this point . i expect guns of the type used a bondi will be banned as well. i've been emailing my local labor MP to voice concerns, i suggest every gun owner do the same . the left have taken over this country cause they make a lot of noise. i suggest every gun owner do the same .
stocking up on ammo , buying more magazines . i probably wouldn't be posting that online, or outspoken "aggressive" political views that could be viewed negatively by authorities , as i think increased scrutiny is coming, especially with regards to posts on the net . that's just a general statement, not a criticism of you personally . cheers

No1Mk3 wrote:alexjones wrote:Terraincognita wrote:Queensland deputy premier says Queensland only signing on for limiting the number of firearms a licensee can own.Didn’t give a number but if this is the only change not a bad result for Queenslanders. But we’ll wait and see.
Not a bad result? I own nearly 50 guns. I am going to get raped here!!!
Lets see if I can move them to my collector licence.
If Collectors Licence is allowed to continue and itself is not brought under the limit of firearms allowed, or worse only permitted for deactivated arms. This is my biggest fear as I have an extensive collection, and have invested a lifetime in it's study.


