


womble wrote:I have a side by side. Faster than an akkar 3 because two triggers can be fired at the same time.





womble wrote:As per the title. Or your straight pull.
I have two shotgun pta’s in already. To beat the rush. For an over under and a single barrel.
Should you have to surrender yours. As likely in most if not all states.
What are you considering to replace it with ?

womble wrote:I have a side by side. Faster than an akkar 3 because two triggers can be fired at the same time.

Finniss wrote:If my understanding is correct
Lever actions remain Cat B???
Lever release to C.
If so, 1887 or A110. Would prefer a triple barrel for hunting but pricey and too many barrels to clean

womble wrote:Is also best to avoid firing two triggers at the same time

bladeracer wrote:Finniss wrote:If my understanding is correct
Lever actions remain Cat B???
Lever release to C.
If so, 1887 or A110. Would prefer a triple barrel for hunting but pricey and too many barrels to clean
Seeing lots of '87's in Cowboy puts me right off the idea of owning one, what a painful design

bladeracer wrote:womble wrote:I have a side by side. Faster than an akkar 3 because two triggers can be fired at the same time.
I managed to hit a clay at about 40m doing that with the Coachgun


alexjones wrote:I have a triple barrel akkar 3. Faster than a semi auto because no action to cycle.


womble wrote:Also not really because semi auto will cycle quicker than you can pull the trigger twice.

Wapiti wrote:Why do you say that, BR?
They are a lever just like any old 92 or 94, only difference is the lever travel is a little longer.
Sure, they have to be loaded in the tube with the action open, but that's just a "manual of arms" thing, which is simple learning.
If I am using a lever shotty instead of our pumps for a task the 1887 design is incredibly simple to operate and is intuitive.
I can't talk from any competition viewpoint though, but for field use the ability to have 7 shots, with one in the chamber on halfcock is a very fast, safe and quiet way to get lead moving downrange.
We had an aggressive brown snake in the yard yesterday, and the shotgun I reached for was the Chinaman 1887, and not because I have a bias either. Very quick.


womble wrote:It’s cool that the western action scene slicks up their guns, but I don’t know much about it.
Can you get internal hammer shotguns to just drop open as easily as hammer guns ?
And if so, is there a downside to that ?
I don’t really want a hair trigger on a side by side. Or is that preferable.
Do they delete the tang safety ?
Because it looks like the boito/stoeger shotguns are the popular choice.

bladeracer wrote:Wapiti wrote:Why do you say that, BR?
They are a lever just like any old 92 or 94, only difference is the lever travel is a little longer.
Sure, they have to be loaded in the tube with the action open, but that's just a "manual of arms" thing, which is simple learning.
If I am using a lever shotty instead of our pumps for a task the 1887 design is incredibly simple to operate and is intuitive.
I can't talk from any competition viewpoint though, but for field use the ability to have 7 shots, with one in the chamber on halfcock is a very fast, safe and quiet way to get lead moving downrange.
We had an aggressive brown snake in the yard yesterday, and the shotgun I reached for was the Chinaman 1887, and not because I have a bias either. Very quick.
Fiddly to load and what I've seen does not make me think that they're reliable, I definitely wouldn't want to rely on one against a pack of pigs or dogs. I would think if I had to get a gun out of the safe quick, and load it quick, I'd be grabbing the coachgun.

womble wrote:It’s cool that the western action scene slicks up their guns, but I don’t know much about it.
Can you get internal hammer shotguns to just drop open as easily as hammer guns ?
And if so, is there a downside to that ?
I don’t really want a hair trigger on a side by side. Or is that preferable.
Do they delete the tang safety ?
Because it looks like the boito/stoeger shotguns are the popular choice.

Wapiti wrote:All I can ask now then after that, is, have you used one as your only firearm in the bush?
Against dogs or pigs?
Well I have, and haven't experienced one issue with mine.
And the only fiddly thing is that you have to open the action to load the tube mag.
There are no reliability issues except the skill of the user, at least with mine. And it's serial no. 0000001, first one ever made and kept especially by Nioa for a Mr. Tony Cleaver's collection so maybe mine had some extra care?
And has been said here, after 3 shots or more, game has gone and the party is over, except in a worst sense scenario, when this gun has 4 shells left in it.
I don't shoot, or ever have done, Western Action. But also having Winchester lever rifles myself, the 1887 is just as quick, and "fiddly" to load as they are in the bush, but never have I run out of ammo before the excitement was over except from my own failings.
But hey, either than the awful, heavy 3-shot Akkar, which I personally would never own what are you all going to do. Start looking for doubles I guess. I'm just suggesting a firearm that works for 7 shots in a string, in cat B.
But for those reading this looking for a great alternative, I'm a bloke that uses one and has found it worth owning even with forend-release and pump action options in the safe.







Wapiti wrote:Well mate, I've never had any dramas with both the IAC or my Chiappa, so I just wanted to clear the air on all the stuff I read out there from the "people who've seen..." all of this.
And I'm certainly not trying to discount anything anyone else is saying either, particularly you mate.
No firearm is ever 100% idiot-proof either, also no disrespect intended.
Any person who's excited in a match or not in control can trip a trigger or slip their thumb off a hammer. Maybe those people should concentrate on the style of firearm in their hands when they are under self-imposed stress. There are some procedures different and unique to these guns to master. If you do, it's second nature like learning to use any equipment.
I hardly ever use shotguns, because they are very limited in useability anyway and are certainly a niche need, as others have said here.
But even with my limited skill with shot guns, and the supposed mechanical issues with a design from 1887 (which my style of use has never found yet), I've caned my farmer peers in our clay events with their O/U Berettas and Mirokus, using the 2-shot fast feature on the two stands they set up. Not from skill, but just familiarity with the gun.
Funniest bit is, when I drag the Italian 1887 out of the bag with it's colour-case hardened steel buttplate and action, everyone laughs and says, "put that outdated club away". They aren't laughing at the end of the session though.
By the looks of what's going to happen in NSW, maybe elsewhere in other Labor states, I only can add my own personal experiences with an option for those who might still want a repeating shotgun in a category you blokes can still enjoy. That's all.
I've never had an issue with both of mine, so I reckon it's all bias and user error. Has to be, because I'm only a user, not an expert.
Good luck with picking your alternatives.

Don’t know what the new laws will be yet