So, an update for those interested in what's in factory ammo and how (in)consistent it is. If it is.
I pulled a heap of bullets, and they were indeed crimped in but the press and collet tool has no trouble. My other presses have 7 and 8 dies in them respectively and are all set up, so I dragged an unused press bolted to a RHS offcut into the workshop area. Then dumped each individual case of powder into some electronic scales, to speed things up. Using a beam scale would've had me reaching for my hair to pull out which won't work, because in summer I shave my head every coupla days.
The setup.

- Ppress.jpg (678.54 KiB) Viewed 1716 times
So here's the list. Couple of things to mention.
The difference between high and low weights was 0.8gns. Not unexpected from automatically thrown powder, if it was coarse stick powder like AR2209. It throws from powder throwers just as inaccurately, even worse at times. Too much variation for me, and WAY to much when the load is up at the point of being dangerous.
But this powder is a super-fine ball powder, as I'd expect from Winchester because that's what they make. So to me, a 0.8gn variation is pretty much rubbish.
We know this load is super-hot, and when I blew this case it was a super-hot afternoon, and ball powder is very temperature sensitive.
The high loads of 48.6 are most likely the ones giving the trouble. On a frosty -5' morning here in winter, probably no drama.
So what is the powder, to compare whether this load is hot or not.
It can't be 760, because that would be a 120% volume load with 135gn bullets at that incredible velocity.
It most likely would've been 748, which is a great powder for 308 cases and gives top velocities but can give high pressures.
Uncle Nick Harvey's last reloading manual shows these max loads:
With 130gn bullets: 52gns is max
With 150gn bullets, 48gns is max. And I reckon, max for sure.
So, a high of 48.6 and a low of 47.8 with 135's are in no way dangerous overloads compared to the advice in that manual for 748 powder.
So it's not 748.
Anyone got any ideas?

- PowLst.jpg (680.65 KiB) Viewed 1716 times
Now some info, these Winchester cases ARE NOT the same as any commercial Win cases. They are super thick, and so are the necks. With standard Win 308 cases (and I've been measuring them for 20 years), loaded rounds measure a diameter of .334 thou. Deduct 2-3 thou and you have your accurate consistent neck grip of that much. Personal preference and use needs will determine which dimension you want.
These WMA stamped, Winchester military cases, the necks of the loaded rounds are .339-340 thou. So I picked a titanium bush for the neck die that was .336. So I had at least 003 thou neck tension, because sometimes this ammo is going to go through an autoloader and definitely NOT babied.
Plus, I crimp these cartridges.
I plan to use the standard ball powder, but I'm going to put it back in the neck-sized cases with a load of 46.5gns.
This i will try, looking for pressure signs and measuring the case heads before and after firing.
Too much? that's almost 2gns less than standard, and each case will be EXACTLY the same, not all over the place.
It's hot here this time of the year, so a good time to decide on an all-year load.