Gun Control Australia Wants the "Hand Cannon" Banned Now !

News and events in the media and political arena relating to firearms.

Gun Control Australia Wants the "Hand Cannon" Banned Now !

Post by MeccaOz » 19 Oct 2014, 12:40 pm

A gun called the 'hand cannon' capable of firing five shots in less than one second is still LEGALLY for sale in Australia ... and the anti-gun lobby wants it banned now

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z3GYSTlld1
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook



Read the rest here.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... d-now.html
User avatar
MeccaOz
Warrant Officer C2
Warrant Officer C2
 
Posts: 1013
Western Australia

Re: Gun Control Australia Wants the "Hand Cannon" Banned Now

Post by MeccaOz » 19 Oct 2014, 12:43 pm

'They are so lightweight and easy to conceal and easy to use in a moving car' says Samantha Lee of semi-automatic handguns, which the anti-gun lobby want banned in Australia


Hmmm I guess she has done alot of drive by's with knowledge like that lol
User avatar
MeccaOz
Warrant Officer C2
Warrant Officer C2
 
Posts: 1013
Western Australia

Re: Gun Control Australia Wants the "Hand Cannon" Banned Now

Post by Bennybigbores » 19 Oct 2014, 1:18 pm

Thats the only way to truely test a gun isn't it, just did a drive by on some bunnies with the 17hmr, rival gang of wascals moving in on my (turf!), hand cannon would have scared them more though!
Howa axiom varmint .243
C.Gustav 6.5x55 (sporterised)
Savage mkII T.hole varmint 17hmr
Chiappa lever action 12g
Baikal S.Shot .308
Mossberg plinkster .22
Norinco lever .22
E.T.C
Bennybigbores
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 180
New South Wales

Re: Gun Control Australia Wants the "Hand Cannon" Banned Now

Post by Baldrick314 » 19 Oct 2014, 1:31 pm

.50 desert eagles are "readily available" what a crock

Early in the article it says "at least 1800 firearms are reported stolen annually" and then further down it says "up to 1800 are reported stolen annually" so which is it, cos there's a huge difference there.

I'm surprised these people get taken as seriously as they do when they can't get even the basic parts of their arguments sorted. Makes me angry reading the absolute crap they drivel on to scare the uneducated public
.177, .22lr, .22-250R, 2x .308W, .30-30W, 7.62x54r, 8x56r, 9x19, .357 Mag, 12GA
User avatar
Baldrick314
Staff Sergeant
Staff Sergeant
 
Posts: 980
New South Wales

Re: Gun Control Australia Wants the "Hand Cannon" Banned Now

Post by MeccaOz » 19 Oct 2014, 2:04 pm

Baldrick314 wrote:.50 desert eagles are "readily available" what a crock

Early in the article it says "at least 1800 firearms are reported stolen annually" and then further down it says "up to 1800 are reported stolen annually" so which is it, cos there's a huge difference there.

I'm surprised these people get taken as seriously as they do when they can't get even the basic parts of their arguments sorted. Makes me angry reading the absolute crap they drivel on to scare the uneducated public


Im surprised they are taken seriously at all, they consist of two people, whereas the SSAA has 1000's of members
User avatar
MeccaOz
Warrant Officer C2
Warrant Officer C2
 
Posts: 1013
Western Australia

Re: Gun Control Australia Wants the "Hand Cannon" Banned Now

Post by Baldrick314 » 19 Oct 2014, 3:08 pm

SSAA isn't very vocal though. They defend against this kind of stuff but they don't do a lot of proactive campaigning to change people's minds about shooters
.177, .22lr, .22-250R, 2x .308W, .30-30W, 7.62x54r, 8x56r, 9x19, .357 Mag, 12GA
User avatar
Baldrick314
Staff Sergeant
Staff Sergeant
 
Posts: 980
New South Wales

Re: Gun Control Australia Wants the "Hand Cannon" Banned Now

Post by Releb » 19 Oct 2014, 5:18 pm

Baldrick314 wrote:Early in the article it says "at least 1800 firearms are reported stolen annually" and then further down it says "up to 1800 are reported stolen annually" so which is it, cos there's a huge difference there.


Throw a dart at a board, times the number by 10 ...number of firearms are stolen...

:roll:

Pull more numbers out of your ass while you're there.
Tikka Stainless from 30-06 Springfield lane.
Releb
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 117
Queensland

Re: Gun Control Australia Wants the "Hand Cannon" Banned Now

Post by bluerob » 20 Oct 2014, 8:21 am

Baldrick314 wrote:SSAA isn't very vocal though. They defend against this kind of stuff but they don't do a lot of proactive campaigning to change people's minds about shooters


+ 1
bluerob
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 342
New South Wales

Re: Gun Control Australia Wants the "Hand Cannon" Banned Now

Post by cavok » 20 Oct 2014, 8:48 am

"A gun called the 'hand cannon' capable of firing five shots in less than one second is still LEGALLY for sale in Australia ... and the anti-gun lobby wants it banned now

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z3GYSTlld1"

So the anti gun lobby wants to ban "hand Cannon" 5 shoots in under a second, I shoot a great deal and I cannot shoot a semi 5 times in a second, I struggle at more than 10 metres to fire 3 shoots accurately. Ms Lee needs to stop watching experts in their field demonstrate shooting abilities and assume that this can be duplicated by a person with no sh0oting experience, or very little "illegal gun owners of handguns would not have a great deal".
A more powerful gun is the .500 revolver.
However most drive by shooting are by non registered gun owners, crooks, who's weapon of choice is a AK47 or similar. They are not actually trying to kill anyone in their drive by shootings, THEY are making a point.
“When all about you have lost their heads and you remain calm, perhaps you do not understand the problem”.
Per ardua ad astra.
User avatar
cavok
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 353
Victoria

Re: Gun Control Australia Wants the "Hand Cannon" Banned Now

Post by agentzero » 20 Oct 2014, 6:30 pm

cavok wrote:"A gun called the 'hand cannon' capable of firing five shots in less than one second is still LEGALLY for sale in Australia ... and the anti-gun lobby wants it banned now

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z3GYSTlld1"

So the anti gun lobby wants to ban "hand Cannon" 5 shoots in under a second, I shoot a great deal and I cannot shoot a semi 5 times in a second, I struggle at more than 10 metres to fire 3 shoots accurately.


But I saw them do it in a movie! It must be possible!

:roll:
User avatar
agentzero
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 183
Tasmania

Re: Gun Control Australia Wants the "Hand Cannon" Banned Now

Post by cavok » 20 Oct 2014, 6:40 pm

OK, I apologise, if you saw it at the movies it must be possible and factual, all things we see at the movies were always real and will always be.

The Greens will contact you to confirm this.

I never knew that there where so many events that took place on TV that I could never understand, now I see the light.
“When all about you have lost their heads and you remain calm, perhaps you do not understand the problem”.
Per ardua ad astra.
User avatar
cavok
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 353
Victoria

Re: Gun Control Australia Wants the "Hand Cannon" Banned Now

Post by MeccaOz » 20 Oct 2014, 7:35 pm

bluerob wrote:
Baldrick314 wrote:SSAA isn't very vocal though. They defend against this kind of stuff but they don't do a lot of proactive campaigning to change people's minds about shooters


+ 1

+ 2
User avatar
MeccaOz
Warrant Officer C2
Warrant Officer C2
 
Posts: 1013
Western Australia

Re: Gun Control Australia Wants the "Hand Cannon" Banned Now

Post by Baldrick314 » 21 Oct 2014, 10:09 am

Update: Jerry Miculek has asked for his video to be removed from this article. He wasn't asked for permission for it's use and after he told them to remove it he was offered royalties which he refused

Link to his facebook which has a post about it: https://m.facebook.com/profile.php?id=267788486618080
.177, .22lr, .22-250R, 2x .308W, .30-30W, 7.62x54r, 8x56r, 9x19, .357 Mag, 12GA
User avatar
Baldrick314
Staff Sergeant
Staff Sergeant
 
Posts: 980
New South Wales

Re: Gun Control Australia Wants the "Hand Cannon" Banned Now

Post by Redwood » 21 Oct 2014, 10:23 am

Baldrick314 wrote:SSAA isn't very vocal though. They defend against this kind of stuff but they don't do a lot of proactive campaigning to change people's minds about shooters


Excellent point.

Being reactive will never get us anywhere, it can only slow our decline.

We've gotta get things changing in our favour, not just argue against the bad changes.
Redwood
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 152
Victoria

Re: Gun Control Australia Wants the "Hand Cannon" Banned Now

Post by Atter » 21 Oct 2014, 10:47 am

5 shots in under a second


I think they were watching some kid play Time Crisis at the arcade and got confused.
Tikka T3 Hunter .260 Remington
Tikka T3 Sporter 6.5x55 SE
CZ 513 .22LR
User avatar
Atter
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 107
Victoria

Re: Gun Control Australia Wants the "Hand Cannon" Banned Now

Post by RoginaJack » 22 Oct 2014, 1:38 pm

Ms Lee -
She also warned authorities that 'they're the same type of firearm used in the Port Arthur massacre, except they are smaller, which in some ways makes them even more dangerous because they are easier to conceal'.


So what Ms Lee is actually saying is that the weapons are nothing alike and she has no idea what she is talking about!.

There has been various cases across Australia where firearms dealers have been charged with moving handguns into the black-market. So what we need to do is ban them, the same way that we banned semi-automatic long-arms,' Ms Lee continued.


OK, Ms Lee -Several cases, in what state and who were the firearm dealers charged?

Some time back a large consignment of illegal pistols were smuggled in via Australia Post and went undetected by customs. This is the area that the senate inquiry should be concentrating on - Australia's' open borders!
Boom, Boom! Tikka, Tikka, Boom! Shoot first, video later.
User avatar
RoginaJack
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1410
Queensland

Re: Gun Control Australia Wants the "Hand Cannon" Banned Now

Post by Korkt » 23 Oct 2014, 1:03 pm

So drivers license for kids to have matchbox cars now?

They're the same, except they are smaller.
User avatar
Korkt
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 265
New South Wales

Re: Gun Control Australia Wants the "Hand Cannon" Banned Now

Post by jordy » 23 Oct 2014, 1:05 pm

She also warned authorities that 'they're the same type of firearm used in the Port Arthur massacre, except they are smaller, which in some ways makes them even more dangerous because they are easier to conceal'.


Same, same. But different.
jordy
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 41
South Australia

Re: Gun Control Australia Wants the "Hand Cannon" Banned Now

Post by Bark » 23 Oct 2014, 2:43 pm

RoginaJack wrote:OK, Ms Lee -Several cases, in what state and who were the firearm dealers charged?


Bingo.

I'm sure we're all over politicians being able to say whatever the f*** they want without having to back it up, and without consequence when it's clearly BS.

Needs to be changed the they need to state there sources every time they put forward information and arguments based on it. (or lack of it as it stands).
User avatar
Bark
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 219
Victoria

Re: Gun Control Australia Wants the "Hand Cannon" Banned Now

Post by RoginaJack » 23 Oct 2014, 6:17 pm

One semi-automatic handgun readily available is the Desert Eagle .50 calibre, which is referred to in some quarters as a 'hand cannon' and is capable of five shots in less than one second and according to one enthusiast 'can punch holes in an engine block'.
'They are so lightweight and easy to conceal and easy to use in a moving car,' Ms Lee added.


Desert Eagle .50 cal. handgun 'readily available".. What a load of rubbish!

"and is capable of five shots in less than one second" ( in the hands of a very experienced shooter, maybe but certainly not by the "drive by mob").
And of course Ms Lee is speaking from practical experience here! I would suggest that Ms Lee has never laid eyes on a Desert Eagle, let alone handled or fired one!

How can anyone come out with such inaccurate statements; aren't these people on oath or required to back up their wild statements with hard facts or can any ratbag stand up in front of a Senate inquiry and spruke absolute garbage? It just degrades the inquiry and makes the Senate look like a joke

I shudder to think what Ms Lee would make of a 35mm Canon SLR 'cause with a flip of a switch, one can go from single shot to bust mode of 12 shots or 14 shots per second in Super High Speed mode and the buffer system is so designed to handle this punishment . Also, a 2X converter can be fitted to double the range. I expect that she will want the "live face detection" system disabled 'cause it would be no good for shooting Zombies! Oh dear...
Boom, Boom! Tikka, Tikka, Boom! Shoot first, video later.
User avatar
RoginaJack
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1410
Queensland

Re: Gun Control Australia Wants the "Hand Cannon" Banned Now

Post by lole » 24 Oct 2014, 7:51 am

RoginaJack wrote:I shudder to think what Ms Lee would make of a 35mm Canon SLR 'cause with a flip of a switch, one can go from single shot to bust mode of 12 shots or 14 shots per second in Super High Speed mode and the buffer system is so designed to handle this punishment . Also, a 2X converter can be fitted to double the range. I expect that she will want the "live face detection" system disabled 'cause it would be no good for shooting Zombies! Oh dear...


Not likely, but I so hope she is reading this right now and it's confusing the s**t out of her :lol:
User avatar
lole
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 359
New South Wales

Re: Gun Control Australia Wants the "Hand Cannon" Banned Now

Post by cavok » 24 Oct 2014, 8:16 am

The Desert Eagle in smaller calibres is available in Australia, just visit usedguns.com however this pistol is not really user friendly, holds to few rounds to be practical. However as was mentioned in the submissions to the Senate enquiry, if the "drive by mob" wanted any particular firearm most come from our far north an are smuggled into Australia through customs. Love the part about the 35ml cannon that is a classic, 2* tele converter, smile as you shoot with a close up.
Most of what the anti gunners like Ms lee speak about are there only to get traction from stupid newspapers and media units. These idiots feed of stupid remarks and for a few hours they have more media headlines, they never question stupidity or reality, they just pedal stories with impunity.
“When all about you have lost their heads and you remain calm, perhaps you do not understand the problem”.
Per ardua ad astra.
User avatar
cavok
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 353
Victoria

Re: Gun Control Australia Wants the "Hand Cannon" Banned Now

Post by RoginaJack » 24 Oct 2014, 2:55 pm

cavok wrote:The Desert Eagle in smaller calibres is available in Australia...."


NO, we're not talking about "smaller calibers" ; the reference was Desert Eagle .50 cal. and I contend that these are not readily available or are the weapon of choice as Ms Lee states.

The part that gets my goat up is these ridicules statements are made and reported by the media and people actually believe them, 'cause it's printed in the press or T.V. so it must be right. Good grief!
Boom, Boom! Tikka, Tikka, Boom! Shoot first, video later.
User avatar
RoginaJack
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1410
Queensland

Re: Gun Control Australia Wants the "Hand Cannon" Banned Now

Post by cavok » 24 Oct 2014, 3:47 pm

Ok, PLEASE visit usedgums.com there is A .50cal Desert Eagle there for sale, any takers. Also .44, .357 and the baby eagle in 9mm. Anything else. I actually did not want to say what I just wrote, I assumed we as shooters knew it was there, no need to scream it from the rooftops. :roll:
“When all about you have lost their heads and you remain calm, perhaps you do not understand the problem”.
Per ardua ad astra.
User avatar
cavok
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 353
Victoria

Re: Gun Control Australia Wants the "Hand Cannon" Banned Now

Post by Timb0 » 24 Oct 2014, 4:26 pm

I shot a .50 cal Desert Eagle once while on a trip to Vegas. I thought I was going to punch two holes in my forehead from the rear sights striking at me like a wild serpent.

The bloke who could crack off 5 shots in a second with one of those would be a weapon himself.
Marlin XT22 .22lr, Ruger M77/22 .22wmr, Rem 7615 .223, Ruger M77 .223, Weatherby MarkV .243, Rem 700 VLS .243, Kimber Montana .270, Weatherby MarkV .270Wby mag, Rem 700 .308, Khan ATac 12ga.
Timb0
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 152
Queensland

Re: Gun Control Australia Wants the "Hand Cannon" Banned Now

Post by cavok » 24 Oct 2014, 4:48 pm

I shot .50 Desert Eagle in 1996 in Adelaide when someone else used his at a match, its not that hard a recoil. I also some years ago shot a S&W 500 with a 6"' barrel, 1 shot was enough for me, the flames came out 12" from the muzzle, it was owned by a gun dealer. For me I will settle for .38 super and 9mm.
“When all about you have lost their heads and you remain calm, perhaps you do not understand the problem”.
Per ardua ad astra.
User avatar
cavok
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 353
Victoria

Re: Gun Control Australia Wants the "Hand Cannon" Banned Now

Post by Baldrick314 » 24 Oct 2014, 5:39 pm

cavok wrote:Ok, PLEASE visit usedgums.com there is A .50cal Desert Eagle there for sale, any takers. Also .44, .357 and the baby eagle in 9mm. Anything else. I actually did not want to say what I just wrote, I assumed we as shooters knew it was there, no need to scream it from the rooftops. :roll:


Just because there is one 50 for sale on usedguns doesn't mean they're readily available. Also you would still need a high cal permit to buy one, that on top of the already strict/ time consuming licensing process for pistols makes them hard to obtain legally
.177, .22lr, .22-250R, 2x .308W, .30-30W, 7.62x54r, 8x56r, 9x19, .357 Mag, 12GA
User avatar
Baldrick314
Staff Sergeant
Staff Sergeant
 
Posts: 980
New South Wales

Re: Gun Control Australia Wants the "Hand Cannon" Banned Now

Post by Timb0 » 24 Oct 2014, 5:42 pm

cavok wrote:I shot .50 Desert Eagle in 1996 in Adelaide when someone else used his at a match, its not that hard a recoil. I also some years ago shot a S&W 500 with a 6"' barrel, 1 shot was enough for me, the flames came out 12" from the muzzle, it was owned by a gun dealer. For me I will settle for .38 super and 9mm.


Maybe not, but I like to tell it that way. :D

For what it's worth coming from someone who has had about 8 months combined experience shooting .22 pistols 8 years ago, it was a handful and if I could I don't think I would buy one. I can't see what it's good for especially gangster style drive by shootings.

As for the greens, maybe they should start to worry about more important green issues. Have they forgotten about their hand gun calibre restrictions already ?
Marlin XT22 .22lr, Ruger M77/22 .22wmr, Rem 7615 .223, Ruger M77 .223, Weatherby MarkV .243, Rem 700 VLS .243, Kimber Montana .270, Weatherby MarkV .270Wby mag, Rem 700 .308, Khan ATac 12ga.
Timb0
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 152
Queensland

Re: Gun Control Australia Wants the "Hand Cannon" Banned Now

Post by Warrigul » 24 Oct 2014, 5:46 pm

Baldrick314 wrote:Just because there is one 50 for sale on usedguns doesn't mean they're readily available. Also you would still need a high cal permit to buy one, that on top of the already strict/ time consuming licensing process for pistols makes them hard to obtain legally


I have enough issues with my .45ACP's(it is not a REAL 1911 unless it is a 45) and .45LC's each year. It is impossible to possess .50 cal or over in TAS unless you are a Gunsmith and then only for the purpose of test and evaluate or a collector but you have to permanently disable it.

Ms LEE referred to a 50 CAL DESERT EAGLE which is NOT readily available unless you get a high calibre exemption- i.e. silhouette. Baldrick and RJ are correct.
Warrigul
Warrant Officer C2
Warrant Officer C2
 
Posts: 1103
-

Re: Gun Control Australia Wants the "Hand Cannon" Banned Now

Post by cavok » 24 Oct 2014, 6:32 pm

I must be on some other planet, a person from south of Melbourne does not believe Ms Lee's assertions that the .50 DE is readily available, far be it for me to argue with such a bold statement. He is of the opinion that a high calibre permit is required. WTF, drive by shooters do not apply for permits, they source their pistol, but mostly automatic rifles, AK47 from elsewhere. Anyway lucky there are no .50 DE anywhere, mostly not in containers from some far flung corner of the globe. That would make them illegal imports and they could be prosecuted for such items. I am also aware that in some far flung state south of Melbourne they are having issues in owning .45 calibre. Guess we all know where they should migrate to.
“When all about you have lost their heads and you remain calm, perhaps you do not understand the problem”.
Per ardua ad astra.
User avatar
cavok
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 353
Victoria

Next

Back to top
 
Return to Firearms related media and politics